CCCH9042 China: Culture, State and Society
Corruption and Anticorruption in China

[This course is under the thematic cluster of ‘Sustaining Cities, Cultures, and the Earth’.]

Course Description

One of the enduring problems harassing Chinese regimes since imperial times has been corruption, which seems to be deeply embedded in the Chinese culture. Corruption has grown particularly fast since the marketization reform in 1978. Given its wide impact on economic growth, social stability and welfare, corruption is arguably the topmost challenge to contemporary Chinese government in the 21st Century. Therefore, studying corruption and anticorruption in China enriches our understanding of the nature of Chinese culture, politics, and economy, and helps us foresee the prospects of China in the new millennium. In this course, through exploring major forms of corruption, the causes of corruption and the effectiveness of anticorruption measures in controlling corruption, students will get a glimpse of various perspectives on understanding contemporary China, such as the hidden rules of the Chinese state, the informal institutions of government, the formation of social network, elite politics, the legal system, and the media-government relationship.

[A compulsory field visit may be scheduled during Reading Week.]

Course Learning Outcomes

On completing the course, students will be able to:

  1. Describe and explain corruption, a major challenge to contemporary China and an enduring problem in Chinese history, from social science theories across disciplines, and eventually form a deeper understanding of China.
  2. Critically examine the limitations of different theories on corruption’s causes, socio-economic impacts, and its solutions.
  3. Apply theories and class knowledge into real world corruption cases and propose analyses and solutions.
  4. Critically reflect their own values and behaviors in influencing social integrity and the building of a responsible society.
  5. Better understand corruption in other countries and bridge experiences of different communities and cultures together to better understand the universal problem of corruption and its impact.

Offer Semester and Day of Teaching

First Semester (Wed)

Study Load

Activities Number of hours
Lectures 26
Tutorials 10
Fieldwork / Visits 4
Reading / Self-study 55
Assessment: Essay / Report writing 20
Assessment: Presentation (incl preparation) 4
Assessment: Group project 40
Total: 159

Assessment: 100% coursework

Assessment Tasks Weighting
Lecture participation 15
Tutorial participation 20
Tutorial presentation 10
Response essays 15
Group research project 40

Required Reading

  • Ambrasseys, N., & Bilham, R. (2011, January 13). Corruption kill. Nature, 153-155.
  • Ang, Y. Y. (2014). Authoritarian restraints on online activism revisited: Why ‘I-paid-a-bribe’ worked in India but failed in China. Comparative politics47(1).
  • Edes, Bartlet. (2017). Regional cooperation to curb corruption in Asia. In T. Gong & I. Scott (Eds.), Routledge handbook on corruption in Asia (Chap. 4.6).
  • Gong, T. (1997). Forms and characteristics of China’s corruption in the 1990s: Change with continuity. Communist and post-communist studies30, 277-288.
  • Guo, X. (2014). Controlling corruption in the party: China’s central discipline inspection commission. The China quarterly, 219, 597-624.
  • Guo, Y. (2008). Corruption in transitional China: An empirical analysis. The China quarterly194, 349-364.
  • Hao, Y., & Johnston, M. (2002). Corruption and the future of economic reform in China. In A. J. Heidenheimer & M. Johnston (Eds), Political corruption: Concepts & contexts (pp. 583-604). New Bruswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers).
  • Ko, K. & Weng, C. (2011). Critical review of conceptual definitions of Chinese corruption: a formal-legal perspective. Journal of contemporary China20, 359-378.
  • Manion, M. (2004). Corruption by design: Building clean government in Mainland China and Hong Kong. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [Chaps. 2, 3]
  • Rose-Ackerman, S. (1999). Corruption and governance: Causes, consequences and reform. Cambridge University Press. [Pages to be assigned]
  • Treisman, D. (2007). What have we learned about the causes of corruption from ten years of cross-national empirical research? Annual review of political science10.
  • Wedeman, A. H. (2012). Double paradox: Rapid growth and rising corruption in China. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. [Pages to be assigned]
  • Zhu, J. (2017). Corruption networks in China: An institutional analysis. In T. Gong and I. Scott (Eds.), Handbook on corruption in Asia (Chapter 1.2). Routledge. [Pages to be assigned]
  • Zhu, J., Lu, J., & Shi, T. (2013). When grapevine news meets mass media: Different information sources and perceptions of government corruption in Mainland China. Comparative Political Studies46(8), 920-946.

Recommended Reading

  • Andersen, T., Bentzen, J., Dalgaard, C.-J., & Selaya, P. (2011). Does the Internet reduce corruption? Evidence from U.S. States and across countries. World Bank Economic Observer24, 3.
  • Bai, R. (2014). Staging corruption: Chinese television and politics. UBC Press. [Pages to be assigned]
  • Brunetti, A. & Weder, B. (2003). A free press is bad news for corruption. Journal of Public Economics87(7-8), 1801-1824.
  • Chang, E., & Golden, M. A. (2010). Sources of corruption in authoritarian regimes. Social Science Quarterly, 91(1), 1-20.
  • Gardiner, J. A. (1993). Defining corruption. Corruption and Reform7(2), 111-124.
  • Gong, T. (2002). Dangerous collusion: Corruption as a collective venture in contemporary China. Communist and Post-Communist Studies35, 85-103.
  • He, Z. (2000). Corruption and anti-corruption in reform China. Communist and Post-Communist China33(2), 243-270.
  • Johnston, M. (2005). Syndromes of corruption: Wealth, power, and democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [pp. 10-13]
  • Kang, D. (2002). Crony capitalism: Corruption and development in South Korea and the Philippines. Cambridge University Press. [Pages to be assigned]
  • Li, L. (2011). Performing bribery in China: Guanxi-practice, corruption with a human face. Journal of Contemporary China20(68), 1-20.
  • Lu, X. (2000). Cadres and corruption: the organizational involution of the Chinese Communist Party. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press. [Pages to be assigned]
  • Manion, M. (2004). Corruption by design: Building clean government in Mainland China and Hong Kong. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [Chaps. 6, 7]
  • Manion, M. (2015). Taking China’s anticorruption campaign seriously. Working paper at Duke University.
  • Meon, P. -G., & Khalid, S. (2005). Does corruption grease or sand the wheels of growth? Public Choice122(1), 69-97.
  • Millington, A., Eberhardt, M., &Wilkinson, B. (2005). Gift giving, guanxi and illicit payments in buyer-supplier relations in China: analyzing the experience of UK companies. Journal of Business Ethics57, 255-68.
  • Nyblade, B., & Reed, S. (2008). Who cheats? Who loots? Political competition and corruption in Japan, 1947-1933. American Journal of Political Science52(4).
  • Quah, J. S. T. (1999). Corruption in Asian countries: Can it be minimized? Public Administration Review59(6), 483-494.
  • Roberts, A. (2006). Blacked out: Government secrecy in the information age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [pp. 107-123]
  • Seligson, M. A. (2002). The impact of corruption on regime legitimacy: a comparative study of four Latin American countries. The Journal of Politics, 64(2), 408-433.
  • Shieh, S. (2005). The rise of collective corruption in China: the Xiamen smuggling case. Journal of Contemporary China14, 67-91.
  • Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1993). Corruption. The Quarterly Journal of Economics108(3), 599-617.
  • Sun, Y. (2004). Corruption and market in contemporary China. Ithaca, NY: Cornell    University Press. [Pages to be assigned]
  • Svensson, J. (2005). Eight questions about corruption. Journal of Economic Perspectives19(3), 19-42.
  • Wang, Y. (Forthcoming). Beyond local protectionism: China’s state-business relations in the last two decades. China Quarterly.
  • Wedeman, A. (2004). The intensification of corruption in China. The China Quarterly, 180, 895-921.
  • Wedeman, A. (2015, September).  Xi Jinping’s tiger hunt: Anti-corruption campaign or political purge? Paper presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Conference, San Francisco.
  • Wedeman, A. H. (2005). Anticorruption campaigns and the intensification of corruption in China. Journal of Contemporary China14 (42), 93-116.
  • Wedeman, A. H. (2012). Double paradox: Rapid growth and rising corruption in China. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. [Chaps. 2, 3]
  • Zhu, J.  (2012, Fall). Do severe penalties deter corruption? A game theoretic analysis of the Chinese case. China Review.
  • Zhu, J. (2008). Why are offices for sale in China? A case study of the office-selling Chain in Heilongjiang Province. Asian Survey48, 558-579.

Recommended Websites

Course Co-ordinator and Teacher(s)

Course Co-ordinator Contact
Dr J. Zhu
Department of Politics and Public Administration, Faculty of Social Sciences
Tel: 3917 2278
Teacher(s) Contact
Dr J. Zhu
Department of Politics and Public Administration, Faculty of Social Sciences
Tel: 3917 2278